Bank charges ruling marks black day for consumers, or for the banks?
THE Supreme
Court ruling in favour of the banks in the bank charges test case
that could have cost the banks some £1.7 billion a year, but was
this win a PR disaster? The land mark ruling on the 25 November
2009, by the UK's new Supreme Court overturned earlier court rulings
that allowed the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to investigate the
fairness in charges for unauthorised overdrafts. This surprise
decision has lead to dismay for both bank customers and consumer
groups. Before this ruling both the Court of Appeal and High Court
have already ruled that charges can be assessed for fairness. Which?
Chief executive, Peter Vicary- Smith, says:- “This is a bitter
blow for the millions of people who have been patiently waiting to
get their bank charges back. Not only does it give banks licence to
charge what they like for unauthorised overdrafts, but it could have
ramifications for other areas of personal finance. The banks now
have no reasons for not introducing other fee charges. The banks
have done everything possible to frustrate the OFT throughout this
process. The OFT and the Government should now explore other avenues
it can pursue to get a fair deal for consumers.” As a
Moneyexpert.com spokesman said:- "This is a bombshell, but
opens more doors than it closes. We will have to fight harder to
change the way the banks work in the UK. The ruling does not say we
can not still go back and try again! We still have options of
attack. Strangely, the banking industry were expecting the ruling to
go against them. This will be short term relief to the UK bank's
Legal and Treasury operations, but more of a headache for the
marketing arm." Even the court has suggested that more
action will follow now that this two years of test case litigation
has failed. This statement about the banking industry's predictions
that the ruling would go against the banks was backed up as the
owner of Abbey and Alliance and Leicester announced, in an
apparently pre-emptive move, that they are launching in January 2010
a fee-free account called Zero. Zero account users would have no
overdraft fees, authorised or otherwise. But on the other hand, did
they see an opening the other banks have not seen? This ruling in
the short term will hurt many millions of people who have been
waiting to get their bank charges back and could make the UK economy
suffer more. Many people were relying on the ruling to help them
out, and that would have lead to more cash in the economy!
"Unauthorised overdrafts is a big money-spinner for banks, but
charging people who do not have cash will only lead to more
bankrupts and banks losing out in the end." another expert
said. Others stated that banks should think again as this result
could come back to haunt them more in the long run. For over a year,
there have been a succession of stories that have tarnished the
names of High Street banks and, with the loss of nearly 10 million
potential claims, it might be the likes of Abbey, and Alliance and
Leicester, who will win, if they stick to plans for the likes of
Zero. Indeed the Supreme Court ruling might not be entirely
beneficial to the mainstream High Street banks. If the ruling had
gone through against the banks and unauthorised overdrafts were
capped at £12 - as credit card default fees are - then this annual
revenue would fall to £860 million. So the ruling has benefited the
banking industry to the tune of about £1.7 billion a year. This
would have been small change when compared with the revelation that
£62 billion emergency funds had been extended to HBOS and RBS to
keep their cash points open at the height of the financial crisis
last year, for example. Just think what that cash injection into the
economy would have done for businesses in the UK, with Christmas
only a few weeks off! This ruling also opens up a huge political
backlash, as well as new legal lines of attack. With some banks in
the UK still sliding towards insolvency, the furore over bank
bonuses, the frustratingly low levels of bank lending, the almost
open-ended taxpayer support and now a surprise court ruling that
gets the banks off the hook for "unfair" bank charges,
the banks are the new bad boys and are seen by the public as
increasingly unpopular. That and the court’s hints at change, leads
to the opening of the flood gates for political intervention by this
failing government, in attempts to win back the public and for any
new party to be seen as the good guys, should Labour fail to win in
2010. On top of that, the ruling will also make the court service
even more unpopular, as many see the system as unfair and a waste of
time. This could lead to a large political backlash, that could
become far more of a worry for the banks then the refund of the
charges! So keep an eye out next year for more action to take place.
As moneyexpert.com said:- "The fight is not over yet... That
was only round one!" Also, will groups like Tesco, who are
well placed to take on the High Street banks, benefit from the
general public revulsion towards high street banking names. This
might in the long run create more opportunities for other players to
enter the market from outside the sector and damage the banks for
more then what they have won! One banking adviser commented on
TV. "Be careful what you wish for, as it might come true."
But as one customer said:- "It does not help us now
whatever happens in the long term. We feel let down by the system
and we now feel no matter what you do, the general public will
always lose. You just cannot win any more, as our government and
legal system have let the banks get a stranglehold, like weeds in a
garden. There is no real competition and to fight on a case by case
basis, will be a joke. It is David verses the Giant, except in this
case the Giant will always win. So what is the point anymore?"
What are your views
on this ruling? Email our newsroom to
news24@southportreporter.com. |
BUS
USERS GET MOBILE WITH ARRIVA M-TICKETING LAUNCH
MOBILE phones
will become the new tickets to ride for Arriva bus customers in the
North West as the company becomes the first UK bus operator to
introduce mobile phone ticketing for all its regional services.
Customers across Arriva’s regional bus businesses in England,
Scotland and Wales, will be able to buy daily, weekly and
four-weekly tickets via their mobile phones following the national
launch of Arriva’s m-ticketing service.
Arriva’s introduction of m-ticketing is believed to be the largest
deployment of its kind in the world, covering approximately 1,000
routes served by Arriva’s regional fleet of 4,500 buses. It will
enable passengers to use their mobile phones to purchase tickets and
then display them to the driver.
Phil Stone, managing director of Arriva North West, said:-
“The mobile phone is an essential part of modern life and m-tickets
will give additional flexibility and convenience to our customers.
The launch of m-ticketing across all our regions will mean that
millions of bus journeys will be taken using the technology. We
believe this represents the largest introduction of its type in the
world. Customers can buy tickets using their phone at anytime
from wherever they happen to be. It saves them searching out the
cash to buy a ticket and speeds up getting on the bus as they simply
show the ticket on the phone display to the driver. This
approach has great advantages over some other mobile ticketing
systems as we can roll it out across our networks without any
downtime for vehicles or costly on-board technology. We believe the
convenience of having the ticket on the mobile will encourage more
customers to take up our multi-journey tickets.”
Arriva has worked in partnership with Concept Data Technologies to
create the m-ticketing service, which is a free application that is
downloaded directly onto customers’ phones. Once downloaded it
allows people to purchase a range of tickets. Tickets can be bought
either directly through the application via a registered card or by
purchasing credit from any PayPoint outlet either by cash or card.
People using the m-ticketing service can save 10% off Arriva
4-weekly saver tickets.
The m-ticketing technology can be operated on any GPRS (General
Packet Radio Service) enabled phone. The service also works on
Blackberry smartphones and from early 2010 will be iPhone compatible
as well. Phones with green screens, which are typically four or more
years old, cannot be used. Arriva’s m-ticketing service will work on
all mobile networks.
How m-ticket works in 3 simple steps:-
1) Customers can
register online now at arrivabus.co.uk/m-ticket. Once registered,
the m-ticket application will be sent - free of charge - to their
phone.
2) Select and purchase their ticket. Either by credit/debit card or
by cash for people who prefer or don’t have a credit/debit card. For
cash top-ups, customers will need to add Arriva credit to their
phone, using the m-ticket application’s 'Add-cash'
option at a PayPoint outlet or Arriva Travel shop.
3) Activate the ticket on the day and time of travel. Their ticket
will be displayed on the mobile phone screen and simply needs to be
shown it to driver. The ticket runs from the date of first use, not
purchase.
TEENAGER ARRESTED FOLLOWING LASER PEN INCIDENT IN SPEKE
MERSEYSIDE
Police have arrested a 16 year old boy on suspicion of endangering
an aircraft following an incident in Speke on Friday night in which
a laser pen was shone at an easyJet plane landing at Liverpool John
Lennon Airport.
The plane was landing at Liverpool having set off from Belfast at
5.30pm when the pilot reported to air traffic control that a laser
pen had been shone at the cockpit by someone on the ground.
The Merseyside Police helicopter, which was already operating in the
south Liverpool area, conducted a search of the area and as it was
doing so, a laser pen was aimed at it from below.
The crew relayed the information to police officers on the ground,
who stopped a car in Speke at around 6.10pm and arrested a 16 year
old boy on suspicion of endangering both aircraft.
He was interviewed by officers and released on police bail pending
further enquiries. |