The
Budget’s 2011
ONE of the UK’s leading business
organisations are welcoming several short term measures to boost
enterprise announced in the Budget, but they are arguing that more
must be done in the long-term if small businesses are to truly drive
economic growth and job creation.
The Forum of Private Business believes substantial measures on fuel
duty – including an immediate cut and cancelling annual rises that
had resulted from the introduction of the fuel duty escalator;
should provide some cash flow relief for struggling small firms.
Equally, the Forum is welcoming a range of small business tax breaks
including lower rates for businesses based in 21 new
‘enterprise zones’, increasing tax relief available under
the Enterprise Investment Scheme and the decision to keep Community
Investment Tax Relief contrary to recommendations made by the Office
of Tax Simplification (OTS).
However, while the Forum also welcomes the Government’s continued
commitment to reducing corporation tax overall, it is disappointed
that small firms’ corporation tax bills are not being reduced by a
similar rate to the higher level paid by big businesses, which the
Chancellor is now slashing by 2% in April 2011 - double the
reduction that had been planned – and from 28% to 23% by April 2014.
The Forum believes a number of opportunities have been missed for
real root-and-branch tax simplification and radical reforms removing
small firms from tax wherever possible – incentivising small
businesses charged with leading economic recovery, rather than
pandering to large companies. In its submission to the 2011 Budget
the Forum called for the lower corporation tax rate to be cut to
17%.
In particular, the organisation is concerned that simply lowering
from £18 to £15 the threshold price of goods shipped via the Channel
Islands on which no VAT is payable will not stop large companies
exploiting Low Value Consignment Relief (LVCR).
The Forum agrees with the pressure group Retailers Against VAT Abuse
(RAVAS) that the real test is whether businesses that do not have
offshore facilities can now compete on an equal basis with their
counterparts on the Channel Islands. The answer for smaller
retailers – including those selling CDs and DVDs which will still
have to charge VAT – is clearly no.
It is important that the Government’s plans to work with the
European Commission to limit the scope of the relief so that it can
no longer be exploited for a purpose other than what it was not
intended for stops the LVCR trade once and for all.
The Forum also believes that merging Income Tax and National
Insurance (NI) into a single payroll tax is a step towards
simplifying the UK’s complex tax system, and welcomes the
announcement of a consultation into this, but is concerned that NI –
a tax on employment at a time small businesses are charged with
creating jobs - is still rising for most firms.
With the ability of small businesses to employ people under
scrutiny, and a raft of employment legislation covering issues such
as the default retirement age, pensions, parental leave and agency
workers on the horizon for 2011, the Government’s plans for red tape
have been keenly anticipated by business owners struggling to cope
with the annual £12 billion cost of compliance bill.
Providing it produces measures that actually reduce small firms’
administrative burden, a review of all existing business laws is
both welcome and long overdue - as is a specific review of health
and safety law with a commitment to scrapping all unnecessary health
and safety red tape.
In its capacity as Secretariat of the All Party group on
Micro-business, the Forum is also backing the Government’s
announcement that all firms with 10 employees and under – both start
ups and established businesses - are to be given a 3 year holiday on
incoming red tape.
However, the organisation is concerned that the moratorium will not
apply to red tape stemming from EU law – which creates the majority
of regulatory hurdles for small firms - and is also calling for
similar regulatory relief for larger SMEs that have also been
charged with creating the jobs set to be lost in the public sector.
The Forum is also welcoming the announcement of an additional 50,000
apprenticeships over the next 4 years, but believes more support is
required to help entrepreneurs create these apprenticeships within
their businesses, and proposed changes to make planning laws more
business friendly.
“It was important a Budget heralded as being pro-enterprise focused
on easing the dual burdens of tax and red tape – 2 of the biggest
barriers to business growth and job creation facing small
businesses. In that sense, we weren’t disappointed and this was
certainly more than just a nod in the direction of UK SMEs. However,
while there have been some definite steps in the right direction the
Government could have gone further in reducing taxes and making the
tax and regulatory systems more proportional to all small businesses
so that they incentivise to entrepreneurship rather than act as a
barrier to it. In summary, there are some good short-term measures
here, but more radical changes are required over the longer term.
The lessons of history show that you achieve rapid, widespread small
business growth – and therefore economic growth - by removing
entrepreneurs from the stranglehold of tax and red tape as much as
is practically possible. While they will broadly welcome many of the
Chancellors’ announcements, British business owners will be looking
for much more in the way of real actions in the weeks, months and
years that lie ahead.” said the Forum’s Chief Executive,
Phil Orford.
The Forum’s Budget submission was based on its new Get Britain
Tradingcampaign, which aims to raise awareness of the significant
contribution played by small businesses in the UK’s economy and
create trading conditions conducive to success.
John McDonnell MP, Parliamentary Convenor of the TUCG, which
represents 10 national trade unions, said:- "This is a Budget
for big business which ignores rising unemployment & refuses to halt
the cuts in public services. We are sleepwalking into a deflationary
spiral which will see real hardship for the most vulnerable in our
communities. Osborne is cutting taxes for big business to their
lowest level for forty years at the same time as implimenting savage
cuts that will cut public services to the bone and bring into
question the future of the Welfare State. To pretend that,
"we are all in this together", is a
very bad joke. Ongoing Government attacks on Pensions, Health and
Safety, Pay and Employment Rights are not an acceptable price to pay
for the profligacy of the banks."
The UK’s largest union, UNISON is calling for a change of direction
and a budget for growth including a Robin Hood Tax. This tax on the
banks would add £20 billion to the public purse; 20 times the
measures that the Chancellor has announced to close tax loopholes.
Twenty billion would save local services from shut down, keep
children’s nurseries open, stop hospital’s shedding jobs and save
adult day centres from closure.
UNISON's General Secretary, Dave Prentis, who said:- “Under
the Tories our economy isn’t growing, but the dole queues are. The
Government’s own Office of Budget Responsibility has downgraded the
growth forecast by 0.9% since the Chancellor’s last budget. The
carnage going on in the public sector was completely written out of
the Chancellor’s budget. Osborne should have used this budget to
right his economic wrongs. This no budge budget flies in the face of
mounting evidence of the toll Tory cuts are taking on our economy
and our society. The Chancellor is pinning his hopes on the private
sector driving the recovery – but the evidence shows the private
sector is not creating enough jobs to stop total unemployment from
rising. Struggling families will be pleased that tax receipts have
been used to stop fuel price rises. But with dole queues rising, and
business and consumer confidence low, this is a warning to Osborne –
he will not be able to rely on tax receipts to top up spending much
longer. Osborne's over-hyped increase in tax allowances will in fact
be worth less than £2.50 a week to the average basic rate taxpayer.
This is more than cancelled out by the increase in VAT, which will
cost the average family more than £3 a week, and other reductions in
benefits, tax credits and services, which will cost families even
more. This small tax giveaway will do nothing to help the 2.53
million people on the dole and struggling to find work. It is a drop
in the ocean for millions of public sector workers hit by pay
freezes. With inflation up to 5.5%, any benefit will swiftly be
wiped out by higher prices. The Learjet levy is a token gesture. The
mega-rich who can afford a private plane could pay a lot more
towards our recovery. Instead, public sector workers are cutting
back on food, vital healthcare such as dentists and prescriptions,
and are still racking up high levels of personal debt. The poor,
sick and vulnerable who did not gamble away our future are paying
the price, as the public services they rely on disappear.”
Do you agree with these people? Let us know by
emailing our newsroom. |
New
Communities given welcome...
LIVEROPOOL John Lennon Airport (JLA)
along with the Airport Operators Association (AOA) – the trade
association that represents UK airports, has welcomed the fact that
the Chancellor has listened to submissions made by JLA and other AOA
members and decided not to increase Air Passenger Duty (APD) for
this year.
However Management at the Airport are warning that passengers still
face the prospect of ‘double taxation’ and further
increases in flying taxes when aviation enters the EU Emissions
Trading Scheme in 2012; and also that the Chancellor may raise APD
next year (2012).
APD in the UK is already up to 8.5 times more than the European
average. Many European countries have either already abandoned their
aviation taxes, or indicated that they will do so, due to the
negative effects on their economies including:- Belgium, Denmark,
Germany, Holland, Ireland and Malta.
Even with the freeze, the UK economy is already losing £750m in GDP
and 18,000 jobs as a direct result of the recent November 2010 rises
in APD, not to mention the thousands of UK tourism jobs lost because
less people can afford to holiday here. Scotland alone is estimated
to be losing over 1.2m passengers, 148,000 tourists and £77m in
revenue in the next 3 years.
Craig Richmond, CEO of Peel Airports commented:- “We are
pleased that the Government has listened to our concerns, however
this is only the beginning and we urge anyone who travels by air,
both on business or leisure, to continue to lobby Government
further. Unlike the vast majority of European nations who
experienced air passenger growth in 2010, the UK saw a decline. A
‘double taxation’ in 2012 will simply deter even more passengers
from flying to and from the UK in future.”
Darren Caplan, Chief Executive of the Airport Operators Association,
said:- “UK airports cautiously welcome the fact that Air
Passenger Duty is not going up immediately, though would not support
the delayed increase coming into effect next year. We now call on
the Chancellor to emulate the decisions of European competitor
nations to reduce or abolish APD in the UK. Additionally, many
people aren’t aware that UK aviation is also joining the EU
Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) in 2012. This means that as things
stand passengers will be subject to the costs of both ETS as well as
aviation tax, so that holidaymakers and business travellers will
effectively be paying double taxation next year. The Chancellor now
needs to set out the government’s approach on reducing taxes on
flying when the ETS comes in, otherwise passengers will simply be
facing an actual tax increase later on in this 2011-12 financial
year. There should be no double taxation of British aviation.”
UK air passengers fell by 3% in 2010, with the decline far worse
than the majority of other European countries.
The Actors’ Studio,
Seal Street, Liverpool
AFTER a fantastic inaugural year
Write Now, Liverpool’s newest premier one act play festival, is
back! As well as e8 world premiere plays, Write Now, has
exciting new events including Monologue Slam, a chance to showcase
new acting talent in front of industry professionals and Ten Tall
Tower Tales, set in an apartment block it tells 10 stories from 10
storeys, each five minutes long. Write Now also has a fantastic
writing forum event supported by The Liverpool Everyman Playhouse
Literary Department which is free of charge.
Festival Director Ian Moore adds:- “Write Now 2010 highlighted
the need for a platform such as this. New writing, offering
performers, directors and technicians the chance to showcase their
talent is an absolute must for an ever developing arts industry.”
Write Now’s ethos of new writing and supporting talent has seen it
achieve a great deal of support from acclaimed figures such as
Pauline Daniels and BBC correspondent Roger Phillips.
Patron Pauline Daniels admits:- "New writing is the lifeblood
of the industry. It's great that writers will get the chance to
showcase their work as there are fewer and fewer opportunities to
take risks and discover fresh talent."
"Pieces include Warrington based Natalie Hickman’s comedy Monkey
Nuts and, particularly for the family audience, Jersey based,
Liverpool born playwright Neil Walden returns to the city with
Striker, a comedy adventure for everyone aged 4 and above.
Liverpool playwrights are also well represented with 3 pieces:- The
Place Where We Stand, Spion Kop, Mrs Bojangles and Excess Baggage,
which are all premiering. We’ve got something for everyone. Comedy,
drama, farce, historical pieces and something for the kids in a
great season of new writing.” added Ian.
For more information why not visit:-
writenowfestival.co.uk.
JLA urges the
Chancellor to rule out ‘double taxation’ on flying in 2012
LIVEROPOOL John Lennon Airport (JLA)
along with the Airport Operators Association (AOA) – the trade
association that represents UK airports, today welcomed the fact
that the Chancellor has listened to submissions made by JLA and
other AOA members and decided not to increase Air Passenger Duty (APD)
for this year (2011).
However Management at the Airport are warning that passengers still
face the prospect of ‘double taxation’ and further
increases in flying taxes when aviation enters the EU Emissions
Trading Scheme in 2012; and also that the Chancellor may raise APD
next year.
APD in the UK is already up to 8.5 times more than the European
average. Many European countries have either already abandoned their
aviation taxes, or indicated that they will do so, due to the
negative effects on their economies including: Belgium, Denmark,
Germany, Holland, Ireland and Malta.
Even with the freeze, the UK economy is already losing £750m in GDP
and 18,000 jobs as a direct result of the recent November 2010 rises
in APD, not to mention the thousands of UK tourism jobs lost because
less people can afford to holiday here. Scotland alone is estimated
to be losing over 1.2m passengers, 148,000 tourists and £77m in
revenue in the next 3 years.
Craig Richmond, CEO of Peel Airports commented:- “We are
pleased that the Government has listened to our concerns, however
this is only the beginning and we urge anyone who travels by air,
both on business or leisure, to continue to lobby Government
further. Unlike the vast majority of European nations who
experienced air passenger growth in 2010, the UK saw a decline. A
‘double taxation’ in 2012 will simply deter even more passengers
from flying to and from the UK in future.”
Darren Caplan, Chief Executive of the Airport Operators Association,
said:- “UK airports cautiously welcome the fact that Air
Passenger Duty is not going up immediately, though would not support
the delayed increase coming into effect next year. We now call on
the Chancellor to emulate the decisions of European competitor
nations to reduce or abolish APD in the UK. Additionally, many
people aren’t aware that UK aviation is also joining the EU
Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) in 2012. This means that as things
stand passengers will be subject to the costs of both ETS as well as
aviation tax, so that holidaymakers and business travellers will
effectively be paying double taxation next year. The Chancellor now
needs to set out the government’s approach on reducing taxes on
flying when the ETS comes in, otherwise passengers will simply be
facing an actual tax increase later on in this 2011 to 2012
financial year. There should be no double taxation of British
aviation." |